[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Jan 2005 22:49:31 +0100 |
What I am doing is implementing screensaver support.
"I think the second way to configure screensavers is the best.", this
is all about how to configuring things, which I am talking about. And
I gave you my opinion about how the current way is a major design flaw
and how by adding more options makes things worse.
This is what I asked about and you just changed the subject to what
you wanted to talk about.
You might wish to reread what you asked for.
I am not convinced guile should be used, but I do not care too much
about it either.
Can you give more concrete reasons on why you think guile shouldn't be
used?
- Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Marco Gerards, 2005/01/08
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/08
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Marco Gerards, 2005/01/08
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console,
Alfred M. Szmidt <=
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Bas Wijnen, 2005/01/08
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2005/01/11
- Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Marcus Brinkmann, 2005/01/11
Re: Screensaver support for the Hurd console, Ognyan Kulev, 2005/01/09