Re: ams-before-putsch

[Thomas Bushnell BSG]

"Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:

>    > It isn't acceptable for calling my I was trying to do for a
>    > hostile, illegal, and a takover by force.  I gave enough of a
>    > warning to people, you could have said `no', and I would have
>    > held of, that is not force.  If this `takeover' was done by
>    > force, then I would have commited the patches already, I haven't
>    > since someone, Marcus of all people, voiced their voice.
>
>    Marcus already asked you not to commit those patches.  I saw the
>    request on the list.
>
> And look: no patches commited.  Marcus still has no right calling it a
> putch.

So what exactly are you complaining about?  Can we please tone things
down a bit?