Re: commit access policies

[Sergio Lopez]

El lun, 14-11-2005 a las 08:29 -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG escribió:
> "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >    > The only really good reason for swapping branches is that the
> >    > code in right now HEAD is b0rked, not that gnumach-1-branch is
> >    > the most cared about.
> >
> >    So fix the code in HEAD.
> >
> > No.  I have no interest in any code that uses OSKit.
> 
> I thought you wanted me to give direction.
> 
> Good grief.
> 

Alfred, Thomas, I don't know if your getting fun of this, but I think it
isn't funny at all. Please keep serious.

1.- Although everybody use gnumach-1-branch, HEAD is oskit-branch. This
maybe wrong, but it's a maintainer's decission.

2.- Right now, gnumach-1-branch is only for bugfixes. This maybe wrong,
but it's maintainer's decission.

3.- People who still want to work in Mach/Hurd, want to do over
gnumach-1-branch. And they would like to keep their changes into Hurd's
CVS. So until one of the maintainers recovers his interest in Mach/Hurd,
a new branch will be extremly desirable.

Thanks.
-- 
Sergio Lopez
koro@sinrega.org