[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1

From: olafBuddenhagen
Subject: Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:43:54 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)


On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:51:12AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Barry deFreese, le Sat 28 Oct 2006 20:48:17 -0400, a écrit :
> > The %p one is even a bit of a question.  I believe %p is correct but
> > I also dropped the 0x and maybe I shouldn't have?
> You shouldn't indeed.  Some tools may depend on being able to parse
> this.

The glibc version of printf automatically adds 0x (for non-zero values)
when using %p. (i.e. it is equivalent to %#x.) Stesie's version doesn't
seem to follow that, if I'm reading the code correctly... An issue that
should be fixed, IMHO.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]