bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Having generated files in cvs?


From: Leonardo Lopes Pereira
Subject: Re: Having generated files in cvs?
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:24:14 -0300

On Thu, 11 Jan 2007 00:54:55 +0100
Thomas Schwinge <address@hidden> wrote:

> Hello!
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 12:28:20AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Thomas Schwinge, le Tue 09 Jan 2007 00:21:07 +0100, a ?crit :
> > > Others's opinions were also to remove all (?) generated files from the
> > > revision control system.
> > 
> > Yes, doc/ too is a pain to clean before diffing.
> 
> I identified the following files for removal, as they are properly
> restored after running ``autoreconf -i'' and ``make'' (for the `doc/'
> files).  Anything to add there?

version.c.in

> 
> #v+
> COPYING
> INSTALL
> Makefile.in
> aclocal.m4
> config.h.in
> build-aux/compile
> build-aux/config.guess
> build-aux/config.sub
> build-aux/depcomp
> build-aux/install-sh
> build-aux/mdate-sh
> build-aux/missing
> build-aux/texinfo.tex
> doc/mach.info
> doc/mach.info-1
> doc/mach.info-2
> doc/stamp-vti
> doc/version.texi
> #v-
> 
> 
> Also, I'll have to invent something new for my recently added ``Web pages
> of the GNU Mach Reference Manual'' magic in `doc/Makefrag.am'.  But
> that's really no show stopper for removing the generated files.  ;-)
> 
> 
> Regards,
>  Thomas
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]