Re: misspellings in fsys_reply.defs ?

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hello!

A new record in ``better late than never'' bug fixing?  Five and a half
years?  Hmm.


On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:09:50AM -0600, Austin Thompson wrote:
> I checked out latest cvs today and noticed something I found odd in 
> hurd/hurd/fsys_reply.defs: 
> 
> simpleroutine fsys_startup_reply (
>       repsy_port: reply_port_t;   // <------ misspelling of reply_port??
>       retcode: kern_return_t;
>       realnode: mach_port_send_t);

That one was already fixed.

> simpleroutine fsys_syncfs_reply (
>       reply_port: reply_port_t;
>       retocde: kern_return_t);  // <------- misspelling of retcode??

And that one I fixed just now.

> Just wondering if there's something I'm missing or if they are just a typo.

Just typos, yes.  Didn't even have some visible consequence.
Nevertheless: thanks for reporting!


Regards,
 Thomas

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature