[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: My proposal for `PATH_MAX' and friends (was: What is ``access (NULL,

From: Neal H. Walfield
Subject: Re: My proposal for `PATH_MAX' and friends (was: What is ``access (NULL, whatever)'' supposed to do?)
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:56:18 +0200
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.6 (Marutamachi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)

At Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:10:01 -0700,
Thomas Bushnell BSG <address@hidden> wrote:
> [1  <text/plain (quoted-printable)>]
> On Tue, 2007-04-10 at 21:44 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Hello!
> > 
> > We're still being again and again annoyed by programs that use `PATH_MAX'
> > unconditionally.
> Why stop with this one?  Let's just drop all the Hurd features and
> implement the same interface as Linux, as exactly as we can make it.

Legacy compatibility has always ruled the day.  As I understood it,
the idea was to write an OS, not a distribution.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]