[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New machine for shitbox
From: |
olafBuddenhagen |
Subject: |
Re: New machine for shitbox |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Jul 2008 02:16:41 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:56:17PM -0400, Barry deFreese wrote:
> I'm still a little concerned about the HD but I'm not sure how much
> trouble it would be to get it up on a new one. I'm up for
> suggestions, etc.
Shouldn't be a problem I think... Just copy the whole disk :-)
> I also have a nicer machine P4 (2.4Ghz or so I think) that I was
> thinking about replacing flubber with but I am wondering if that makes
> the most sense? Since flubber is now the wiki code and such, should
> it be taken out of the more "public" role? I'm thinking maybe using
> the gnubber hardware for flubber and set up a new gnubber might make
> more sense.
Well, I'm always feeling a bit strange about the fact that a public
machine prone to frequent crashes is also used for the wiki...
On the other hand, the wiki seems to need a fast machine, so using it
for the wiki exclusively would be a waste...
Not sure what the best approach is. Ideally, they should run in two
distinct VMs sharing the hardware :-)
-antrik-
- New machine for shitbox, Barry deFreese, 2008/07/03
- Re: New machine for shitbox,
olafBuddenhagen <=
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Dani Doni, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Samuel Thibault, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Dani Doni, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Samuel Thibault, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Dani Doni, 2008/07/05
- Re: New machine for shitbox, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/07/08
Re: New machine for shitbox / wiki system, Thomas Schwinge, 2008/07/08