[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabiliti
From: |
Arne Babenhauserheide |
Subject: |
Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:55:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.25-gentoo-r7; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Dienstag 30 Dezember 2008 12:10:39 schrieb Michal Suchanek:
> The underlying interface the two binaries use is different. However,
> they both show a window on my screen and access the same Documents
> folder for opening and saving files.
> This is all the compatibility one ever needs for a typical application.
What about dbus?
Most of my typical applications use it for communication.
Best wishes,
Arne
--
-- My stuff: http://draketo.de - stories, songs, poems, programs and stuff :)
-- Infinite Hands: http://infinite-hands.draketo.de - singing a part of the
history of free software.
-- Ein Würfel System: http://1w6.org - einfach saubere (Rollenspiel-) Regeln.
-- PGP/GnuPG: http://draketo.de/inhalt/ich/pubkey.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, (continued)
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Michal Suchanek, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Michal Suchanek, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Michal Suchanek, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Michal Suchanek, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff,
Arne Babenhauserheide <=
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Michal Suchanek, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/12/30
- Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Michal Suchanek, 2008/12/31
Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, olafBuddenhagen, 2008/12/17
Re: Niches for the Hurd: evaluation method; was: DRM musings, capabilities and stuff, Arne Babenhauserheide, 2008/12/07