[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unionmount. Basic details
From: |
Carl Fredrik Hammar |
Subject: |
Re: Unionmount. Basic details |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:48:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 07:18:34PM +0300, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> Carl Fredrik Hammar <hammy.lite@gmail.com> writes:
> >> I actually realized a couple of days ago that unionmount could probably
> >> be done by a combination of nsmux and unionfs: I think it should be
> >> possible to do something like
> >>
> >> settrans veth /hurd/unionfs veth veth,,eth-multiplexer
> >>
> >> (I didn't want to bring this up yet, to avoid further confusion :-) )
> >
> > Bootstrapping a unionmount of nsmux like might be tricky. ;-)
>
> Hm, browsing through my memory I cannot remember why setting a
> unionmount translator via nsmux would be tricky. It's no trickier that
> setting it through settrans, IMHO :-)
It was just intended as a quick comment, but perhaps I should of
explained further. In the example nsmux is used to do a unionmount,
but nsmux itself is a translator you'd want to unionmount. So you'd
need an unionmount of nsmux to unionmount nsmux, in which case you'd
already have a nsmux instance you can use. :-)
Regards,
Fredrik
- Re: Unionmount. Basic details, (continued)
- Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/26
- Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/09
- Re: Unionmount. Basic details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/04/10
- Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/26
- Message not available
- Re: Unionmount. Basic details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/04/28
Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/09
Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/26
Re: Unionmount. Basic details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/04/10
Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/26
Re: Unionmount. Basic details, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/04/09
Re: Unionmount. Basic details, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/04/26