[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Moving to git

From: Thomas Schwinge
Subject: Re: Moving to git
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:31:09 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)


On Fri, Jul 03, 2009 at 10:00:52PM +0200, address@hidden wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 11:05:50PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > +After commit e227045b06d62ee7d2fbab9d5ade9030ff43170b, Git's commit 
> > messages
> > +are valid.
> Is it really *after*, or starting with?...
> A less ambiguous wording would be preferable :-)

Yes, I'm myself not entirely happy with the wording.

e227 is the last CVS commit.  So indeed *after* that one the pure Git
ones begin.  (Obviously we can't know the SHA1 of the commit
to-be-created, so we can't use that one as ``starting with''.)  Or is
there some flaw in my logic?


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]