[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mercurial vs. git

From: Arne Babenhauserheide
Subject: Re: Mercurial vs. git
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:14:40 +0200
User-agent: KMail/1.12.1 (Linux/2.6.30-gentoo-r5; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; )

Am Mittwoch, 23. September 2009 15:21:28 schrieb Sergiu Ivanov:
> I usually prefer to have a long output than some witty short text
> which contains some jokes, some vague indications, and no real
> instructions.  (I don't remember examples, but I've surely run into
> something like this in the past)

Among Mercurial users there's the saying "if you need to do anything, just 
call hg help <command>, and you have your answer". 

I seldomly see help output as useful as Mercurials. 

So I think the shorter output of mercurial is an advantage, because I acutally 
find what I search for (quite quickly). 

Best wishes, 

--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 
   - singing a part of the history of free software -

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]