[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer
From: |
Da Zheng |
Subject: |
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:44:20 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812) |
Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 03:51:16PM +0100, olafBuddenhagen@gmx.net wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:25:51PM +0200, Sergiu Ivanov wrote:
>>
>>> but looking at the commit history in your hurd.git repository, I can
>>> see that there are commits concerning the multiplexer and other parts
>>> of the Hurd (like boot and filter) mingled.
>> These are probably all related. It's all part of the network
>> virtualization project.
>
> I see. The question, then, is whether it is appropriate to push the
> whole Hurd source tree with Zheng's changes to the incubator, or
> would it be better to have a separate repository for that?
>
I think the whole Hurd source tree is too large. tswchinge said it's a place
where we could put new Hurd components, not the whole Hurd source tree.
Zheng Da
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/21
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/23
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer,
Da Zheng <=
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/24
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/26
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Da Zheng, 2009/12/27
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/28
- Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, Sergiu Ivanov, 2009/12/30
Re: review of modifications of eth-multiplexer, olafBuddenhagen, 2009/12/23