bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?


From: William Leslie
Subject: Re: Shouldn't we use partition type 63 (GNU HURD)?
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:52:06 +1000

Wasn't the intention that the GNU partition type number be reserved for a future hurdish file system? What is the partition type number for, would that mean existing tools will refuse to work with it?

On 18/08/2010 7:46 AM, "Samuel Thibault" <address@hidden> wrote:

Hello,

IIRC, the currently recommended way is to use partition type 83 (Linux)
just because the old debian installer only recognizes those.  Is there
any other reason which prevents us from using type 63 in the Debian
installer?

Samuel


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to address@hidden
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact address@hidden
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/address@hidden


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]