[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]

From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Questions on isc-dhcp]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 03:41:09 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14


Svante Signell, le Wed 02 Mar 2011 09:17:09 +0100, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 02:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > I forgot to comment on the udeb version: I don't think we want to create
> > an inetutils-tools udeb package, while we can simply issue settrans
> > which should be easy and fine enough, since we only handle one
> > interface, thus my changes.
> Ok, I'm attaching the patch, fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch,

Great, it basically just works! I've uploaded a built package to
debian-ports. I've reworked patches a bit to make them more acceptable
to upstream, and here is how you should now submit the bug report, see
attached files:

- "patch" is a patch against the debian/ directory, so the maintainer can
  simply apply it directly.
- "fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch", containing only upstream changes, thus to be
  added to debian/patches by the maintainer.
- the dhclient-script.hurd* files, to be added by the maintainer, filed
  separately to make them more readable for review.

> I think my name should be removed from the patched scripts, you did
> most of the changes.

Nope.  You did the long boring tedious work to get things working again.
You deserve the credit, even if I ended up rewriting things.


Attachment: patch
Description: Text document

Attachment: fix_ftbfs4hurd.dpatch
Description: Text document

Attachment: dhclient-script.hurd
Description: Text document

Attachment: dhclient-script.hurd.udeb
Description: Text document

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]