[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4 |
Date: |
Thu, 10 May 2012 10:44:00 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Thomas Schwinge, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:17:01 +0800, a écrit :
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 14:38:41 +0000, Samuel Thibault
> <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
> > The branch, t/hooks has been created
> > at 56798c444bc584c118b69a3506c4050b34edc35f (commit)
> >
> > - Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > commit 56798c444bc584c118b69a3506c4050b34edc35f
> > Author: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
> > Date: Sat Apr 21 21:03:12 2012 +0200
> >
> > Add link rules to sort hooks
> >
> > otherwise they are not properly recorded
>
> What is this about, what kind of issue does it address? (I'm afraid I
> don't know a lot about this hooks stuff.)
See the RUN_HOOK macro. It needs that all the symbols referenced by
text_set_element are folded between the __stop__ and __start__ symbols,
otherwise the for loop doesn't find them.
Samuel
- Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4, Thomas Schwinge, 2012/05/09
- Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4, Thomas Schwinge, 2012/05/10
- Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4, Thomas Schwinge, 2012/05/10
- Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4, Svante Signell, 2012/05/10
- Re: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4, Samuel Thibault, 2012/05/10
- fork deadlock (was: [SCM] glibc maintenance branch, t/hooks, created. glibc-2.12-869-g56798c4), Thomas Schwinge, 2012/05/30