[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: iconx and execve problems
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: iconx and execve problems |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:38:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, le Tue 05 Jun 2012 08:02:25 +0200, a écrit :
> On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:28 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Thu 10 May 2012 11:30:52 +0200, a écrit :
> > > the icon package FTBFS due to a missing . in PATH. Other architectures
> > > does not have this problem. According to Samuel the problem is missing
> > > info from glibc to the exec server about $0.
> > >
> > > In May-June 2010 Emilio Pozuelo monfort proposed a set of patches to
> > > glibc and the exec server by adding two new RPCs
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-05/msg00108.html
> > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2010-06/msg00002.html
> >
> > Yes. It's also the reason for a bunch of testsuite failures, notably
> > glib. I spent time on adding the patch to glibc this week-end, and
> > currently adding it to the hurd package now.
>
> So this patch is now allowed in glibc, fine! Or is it only Debian?
It's only in Debian.
Samuel