[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC |
Date: |
Thu, 9 May 2013 00:04:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Roland McGrath, le Wed 08 May 2013 14:59:47 -0700, a écrit :
> What for?
> If you want something like this, why does it belong in the microkernel?
So the kernel can tell what a task is in, e.g. show tasks command, in
memory object statistics, etc. Without this it is hard to inspect the
whole system state without divining what task is what process.
Samuel
- RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Barry deFreese, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Roland McGrath, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/08
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/09
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Barry deFreese, 2013/05/09
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Thomas Schwinge, 2013/05/09
- Re: RFC for patch to add task_{set,get}_name RPC, Samuel Thibault, 2013/05/09