[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] include: fix the definition of device_open
From: |
Justus Winter |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] include: fix the definition of device_open |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Apr 2014 23:11:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
alot/0.3.4 |
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2014-04-11 22:27:09)
> Justus Winter, le Fri 11 Apr 2014 09:32:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > Previously, every userspace server implementing the device protocol
> > filtered the device definitions to replace the device_t type with
> > mach_port_send_t to make the device argument of device_open
> > polymorphic. Rather than doing that, which makes it impossible to use
> > translation functions, fix the definition of device_open.
>
> I don't know enough of MIG to be sure of the details: can this break
> applications which would not be doing the sed part?
Yes. However, I found every server implementing the device protocol
doing it and most actually making good use of the extra
mach_msg_type_name_t argument.
Justus
- [PATCH 5/8] devnode: improve the demuxer function, (continued)
- [PATCH 7/8] eth-filter: improve the demuxer function, Justus Winter, 2014/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 7/8] eth-filter: improve the demuxer function, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/11
- [PATCH 8/8] eth-multiplexer: improve the demuxer function, Justus Winter, 2014/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 8/8] eth-multiplexer: improve the demuxer function, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/11
- [PATCH 6/8] libmachdev: improve the demuxer functions, Justus Winter, 2014/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 6/8] libmachdev: improve the demuxer functions, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/11
- Re: [PATCH 1/8] devnode: remove the ourdevice hack, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/12
Re: [PATCH] include: fix the definition of device_open, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/11
- Re: [PATCH] include: fix the definition of device_open,
Justus Winter <=
Re: [PATCH] include: fix the definition of device_open, Samuel Thibault, 2014/04/12