[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
Date: |
Fri, 02 May 2014 10:03:23 +0200 |
On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:45 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Svante Signell, le Thu 24 Apr 2014 10:39:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > - Without split stack enabled around 70 libgo tests pass and 50 fails,
> > most of them with a segfault.
> > - Enabling split stack and using the libc Samuel built all 122 libgo
> > tests fail with a segfault.
>
> Please provide segfault backtrace, rpctrace, etc. Otherwise we won't be
> able to help you.
You already have one in this thread, analysed by Justus:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01736.html
The full rpctrace and gdb backtrace for that case was published on
paste.debian.net, but are gone now. I can upload again if you need them,
or do you want it attached to a mail?
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/01
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06