[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
patch1.diff updated + test results Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbi
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
patch1.diff updated + test results Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate |
Date: |
Wed, 07 May 2014 10:18:47 +0200 |
On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:26 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:25:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 15:07 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 15:05:20 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > On Tue, 2014-05-06 at 14:51 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > > Just to explicitly ask for it:
> > > > >
> > > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 06 May 2014 10:06:49 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > > > For some (yet) unknown reason all libgo tests fails with a segfault
> > > > > > when
> > > > > > run in the build tree: make, sh or something else, the test
> > > > > > commands are
> > > > > > rather hard to track.
> > > > >
> > > > > Doesn't that dump a core? Do you have /servers/crash properly
> > > > > pointing
> > > > > to /servers/crash-dump-core and ulimit -u set to unlimited?
More good news:
- Installing the modified libpthread.so.0.3 made the segfault go away. I
could now run the check from the build tree :-)
- Adding
#define TARGET_THREAD_SSP_OFFSET 0x14
to patch1.diff and building gcc-4.9.0-2 the test results are summarised
as follows :-)
=== libgo Summary ===
# of expected passes 101
# of unexpected failures 21
I think some of the remaining failures are rather easy to fix.
Attached is an updated patch1.diff.
Remains to solve the problem with patch8.diff: Adding arch specific code
to: src/libgo/mksysinfo.sh
patch1.diff
Description: Text Data
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, (continued)
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/06
- patch1.diff updated + test results Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/16
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/16
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/16
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/20
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Svante Signell, 2014/05/21
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/21
- Re: patch8.diff updated Was: Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/21
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Ian Lance Taylor, 2014/05/06
- Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02
Re: GCC's -fsplit-stack disturbing Mach's vm_allocate, Samuel Thibault, 2014/05/02