[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Jun 2014 15:05:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Subhashish, le Sun 01 Jun 2014 18:26:25 +0530, a écrit :
> I'm sure this using of system headers is not the way, but it can be easily
> swapped out when the redefining-from-scratch implementation is ready. I'm
> going with the darwin one now for that seems quick. I'll work on the other
> implementation later.
Ok.
> Now then a question - Do we use struct sigaction in ....bits/sigaction.h
> while passing sigactions both to and from the kernel? (emphasis on both)
Remember that the kernel does not know at all about posix stuff, that
includes signals :)
Signal management is entirely in userspace, and it uses the same
sigaction in all cases.
Samuel
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish, 2014/06/01
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish, 2014/06/01
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Samuel Thibault, 2014/06/01
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish, 2014/06/03
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Samuel Thibault, 2014/06/03
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish, 2014/06/25
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Samuel Thibault, 2014/06/25
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish, 2014/06/25
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Samuel Thibault, 2014/06/26
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish, 2014/06/27
- Re: GSOC - valgrind-hurd queries, Subhashish Pradhan, 2014/06/27