[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2016 14:16:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 12:20:18 +0100, wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 12:02 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, on Mon 14 Mar 2016 09:05:56 +0100, wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-03-14 at 00:57 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Svante Signell, on Sun 13 Mar 2016 14:19:35 +0100, wrote:
> > > > > Running the code reveals that the current implementation in glibc is
> > > > > buggy:
> > > > >
> > >
> > > Well, the program works perfectly on kFreeBSD (Linux is different).
> >
> > That doesn't mean that the program behaves correctly.
>
> Why, because it doesn't have a sleep statement?
I was referring to strict logic: it's not just because it happens to
work on some set of Operating Systems that it is necessarily a correct
behavior.
Here, the problem is that it assumes that receiving credentials still
makes sense *after* the sender process has exited.
Samuel
- Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/13
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/13
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Richard Braun, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Richard Braun, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Svante Signell, 2016/03/14
- Re: Update: Failing tests: Re: RFC: [PATCH] SCM_CREDS support, Samuel Thibault, 2016/03/14