[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Nov 2016 19:50:07 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30) |
Samuel Thibault, on Wed 16 Nov 2016 19:46:52 +0100, wrote:
> The attached testcase does get the faulting address.
And the attached testcase doesn't.
> I really believe the issue is related to this:
Confirmed :)
> > Note that there is a
> >
> > /* XXX what if handler != action->handler (for instance, if a signal
> > * preemptor took over) ? */
> >
> > above. I'd say that when handler != action->handler we should assume
> > it's a legacy handler, and make 'action' point to a default-legacy
> > sigaction structure, so that it doesn't have SA_SIGINFO, and thus the
> > legacy parameters will be passeD.
>
> Samuel
test.c
Description: Text document
- rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Brent W. Baccala, 2016/11/09
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/13
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/16
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/16
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/20
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/20
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Brent W. Baccala, 2016/11/21
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Svante Signell, 2016/11/21
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/21
- Re: rpctrace / libpager / signal preemptor, Samuel Thibault, 2016/11/21