[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ENOTSOCK
|
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
|
Subject: |
Re: ENOTSOCK |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Mar 2017 20:43:50 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) |
Hello,
David Michael, on dim. 12 mars 2017 19:43:40 -0700, wrote:
> A few of the socket-related functions in glibc don't seem to return
> ENOTSOCK. Would it be more "correct" to return this as opposed to
> EMIG_BAD_ID? In particular, can at least send() be made to return
> ENOTSOCK for PulseAudio compatibility? The following example uses
> both MIG_BAD_ID and EOPNOTSUPP as some other functions do, although
> I've only seen it return EMIG_BAD_ID.
Oh indeed, thanks for the suggestion, now commited upstream and in
Debian.
Samuel
- ENOTSOCK, David Michael, 2017/03/12
- Re: ENOTSOCK,
Samuel Thibault <=