bug-inetutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Clients written in Guile.


From: Alfred M. Szmidt
Subject: Re: Clients written in Guile.
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:00:16 +0100

   Envelope-to: address@hidden
   X-Authentication-Warning: outpost.dnsalias.org: jbailey set sender to 
address@hidden using -f
   From: Jeff Bailey <address@hidden>
   Cc: address@hidden
   Date: 13 Nov 2002 08:53:27 -0500
   X-UIDL: ecdb1be20fd108ca3fdd8247d749b774


   --=-1Tr+xP86AUoJe4z2bNnU
   Content-Type: text/plain
   Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

   On Wed, 2002-11-13 at 08:44, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:

   >    Did you have good reasons why we should consider it?

   > I don't have any good reasons whatsoever, this was mostly an general
   > inquiry.  One reason might be that the clients might get easier to
   > maintain, or that messing with packets is easier in Guile (I haven't
   > explored this either of the reasons very far).  Many maybes... Will
   > probably have to implement an client in both C and Guile with similar
   > functionality and see for my self.

   The only case where we should be messing with packets directly is ping,
   and I definitely want libicmp to stay a C library.  There's a little bit
   in FTP with setting up data channels, but even that is just analysing
   data on the stream.

I was talking about clients like a DHCP client, where one has to send
some stuff, recive a bunch of other stuff etc...




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]