[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]
From: |
Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC] |
Date: |
Thu, 06 Mar 2008 23:42:13 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115) |
Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> On 6 Mar 2008, at 20:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>> Peter O'Gorman wrote:
>>> Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> libtool: link: f90 -shared -Qoption ld --whole-archive
>>>>> ./.libs/liba1.a ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive
>>>>> -Qoption ld -soname -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o
>>>>> .libs/liba12.so.0.0.0
>>>>> /convenience.at:211: exit code was 1, expected 0
>>>>> 18. convenience.at:169: 18. FC convenience archives
>>>>> (convenience.at:169): FAILED (convenience.at:211)
>>>
>>> Libtool detected FC as f90, but otherwise used the gcc tools. I'll look
>>> into this.
>>>
>>
>> Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX,
>> things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case,
>> gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the
>> "other fortran compiler" does not exist.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> What happens to a project written with gnu C and vendor fortran? Will
> this test spot g++ and refuse to build the fortran files?
Depends on if those fortran compilers have their own rules or if they
are inheriting.
>
> Maybe we should look into tagging the archive_cmds instead.
I did not see this mail til just now (after the commit). Want me to revert?
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com
- [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Nelson H. F. Beebe, 2008/03/05
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC],
Peter O'Gorman <=
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/07
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/07