[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#9847: [PATCH 3/3] maint: use gnulib's gitlog-to-changelog instead of
bug#9847: [PATCH 3/3] maint: use gnulib's gitlog-to-changelog instead of a ChangeLog file.
Mon, 31 Oct 2011 16:24:35 +0100
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
Gary V. Vaughan skrev 2011-10-23 18:17:
> We already have to enter all the ChangeLog relevant information into the git
> commit log. Instead of worrying about keeping them all in sync, this patch
> generates the current year ChangeLog from the git logs using a gnulib script.
> At the beginning of the year, we can still rotate it out into ChangeLog.2011
> and let the script carry on generating next years ChangeLog.
> It would have been even better to generate all of the ChangeLogs on demand,
> but the formatting differences and missing logs for many of our historic
> commits dating back to CVS especially look awful, so this is a good compromise
> between making maintenance as low-friction as possible and having ugly
> early ChangeLogs.
> I'll push in 72 hours, pending review comments in the mean time.
> * ChangeLog: Removed.
> * HACKING (Editing 'ChangeLog'): Removed. Renumbered other sections to
> * bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Add gitlog-to-changelog.
> * Makefile.am (ChangeLog): Generate the ChangeLog for 2011...
> (dist-hook): ...from the output of `git log' before rolling a
> distribution tarball.
Sorry for the late response, but *all* relevant info from the ChangeLog is
generally *not* included in the git commit message. E.g. commit 72266fce
"docs: improve description of -no-undefined." where the mention of
co-author Matěj Týč is thrown out the window by this change.
There are many more patches with more that one author in the ChangeLog,
and I don't think any of them has any mention of co-authors in their
git commit message.