[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long)
From: |
Han-Wen |
Subject: |
Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long) |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Jul 2002 01:47:29 +0200 |
address@hidden writes:
>
> Here my continuation.
>
> . Section 4.9.5
>
> The tremolo marks extend too much horizontally. I think the more
Fixed. And as a bonus, I deklutzed the tremolo beams a little so the
spacing is less awkward.
> The full rest in the RhythmicStaff context must also be positioned
> hanging on the single staff line, not on a separate ledger line.
fixed.
> gives `12', then `2' instead of `13'.
fixed.
>
> The transposition example with four double-sharps as the key is a
> joke, isn't it?
I changed to a more conventional key sig.
> The stem of the \longa doesn't fit exactly. Probably another
> xdvi alignment thing...
no, I think that's systematic. (The xdvi alignments are always off by
one pixel.)
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys | address@hidden | http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), (continued)
comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/15
comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2002/07/15
Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long), Werner LEMBERG, 2002/07/16
- Re: comments on CVS from 2002-07-14 15:58 (long),
Han-Wen <=