[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: triplet brackets

From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: triplet brackets
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 01:51:17 +0200

address@hidden writes:
> On Friday 13 September 2002 11.34, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> > The default in Lilypond to add a triplet bracket as
> > soon as you don't have a beam with exactly the same
> > length as the triplet. 
> I know, the question was whether this should be considered a good behaviour, 
> or if it would be better to have a different default (for the todo). E.g., I 
> can find no example of sane notes where it would be bad to have a rule like 
> "make the brackets invisible iff the bracketed notes are all in the same 
> beam", but I might be wrong.

Detecting all cases where the bracket is not needed is difficult. For

  [c16 c \times 2/3 { c c c } c16]

I'd say it is not very clear which notes belong to the tuplet.


Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.cs.uu.nl/~hanwen 

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]