[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision
From: |
Mats Bengtsson |
Subject: |
Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision |
Date: |
Tue, 03 Feb 2004 10:12:33 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113 |
Kevin C. Baird wrote:
Hello.
With Lilypond 2.1.0-2 on Debian Testing, I get all of my stems up
without declaring a direction. What would be the easiest way to get a
more standard stem direction scheme (i.e., in toward the majority of the
staff unless beamed)?
That sounds very strange. You don't, by chance, use a construct like
<< {...} \\ {...} >> in your music? That will force the stem directions
for the two voices. If this isn't the problem, please send a small
example file (to the mailing list) showing what you tried.
I also find that my dynamic markings collide horizontally. Is there an
easy way to mandate more horizontal space when a note has a dynamic
marking?
If you search the mailing list archives, you will find lots of
examples of how to set the "padding" property to increase the
distance between the dynamics and the note head /stave, whichever
is closest.
/Mats
- Stem direction & dynamic collision, Kevin C. Baird, 2004/02/02
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision,
Mats Bengtsson <=
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision, Kevin C. Baird, 2004/02/03
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/02/03
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/02/05
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/02/05
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2004/02/12
- Re: Stem direction & dynamic collision, Mats Bengtsson, 2004/02/12