Re: Page numbers

[Mats Bengtsson]

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > Han-Wen,
> >
> > I second the suggestion that print-page-number should be #t by 
> > default; this is causing a lot of confusion to some people.  Could 
> > this be done before 2.10?
>
> Certainly. Please apply/revert this change. The last I can remember is 
> that Mats changed the name of this property.
Hmm! I changed printfirst-page-number -> print-first-page-number and I 
only did
this change in 2.9 and the problem appears also in 2.8 so I don't think 
that's the culprit.

  /Mats