[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Barlines are too thick
|
From: |
Thomas Scharkowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: Barlines are too thick |
|
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jan 2007 14:08:36 +0100 |
For me the thickness is just correct as it is in LilyPond.
> Compared to what? The thickness is based on Barenreiter BA 350;
you mean BA 320! :-)
I have looked into some other editions (Bärenreiter, Peters,
Breitkopf & Härtel, Schott) - the barlines are always thicker than
the stafflines.
Thomas
- Re: Barlines are too thick, (continued)
- Re: Barlines are too thick, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/06
- Re: Barlines are too thick, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/06
- Re: Barlines are too thick,
Thomas Scharkowski <=
- Re: Barlines are too thick, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/07
- Re: Barlines are too thick, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/07
- Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Marnen Laibow-Koser, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Werner LEMBERG, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Bertalan Fodor, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Karl Hammar, 2007/01/08
- Re: Barline scans, Graham Percival, 2007/01/08