[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Barline scans

From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Subject: Re: Barline scans
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 15:31:27 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.90 (gnu/linux)

Marnen Laibow-Koser <address@hidden> writes:

> What do you mean by "further investigation"?  My conclusion

I was referring to Werner and Han-Wen.  By further investigation, I
meant looking at printed output; comparing with the originals that
Lily's bar lines were designed from and trying to discover where it
has gone awry.

>> I am not sure where his measurement of 250% comes from, because we put
>> 190% in, where baerenreiter (occasionally?) uses 220%.
> 250% came from an imprecise 300 dpi image.  The 1200 dpi scan of
> Lilypond's output indeed produced 190% (ok, 191%).

Ok, but that means that LilyPond is on the black side of the scale
rather than far off it.


Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]