bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]

## Re: Wrong abbreviation - decr.

 From: Risto Vääräniemi Subject: Re: Wrong abbreviation - decr. Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 00:24:11 -0800 (PST)

Hi,

Graham Percival-2 wrote:
> Zoltan Selyem wrote:
> > I think the correct abbreviaton for "decrescendo" is "decresc."
> > and not "decr." as \setTextDecresc writes it.
>
> Hmm.  Do you have a reference or something?  The only text I can find at
> the moment is "dim."  I'm honestly not sure if it's supposed to be decr.
> or decresc.

I made a quick search at the omniscient Google. :-) It seems that in the
definition of decrescendo decresc. is used more often as the abbreviation
than decr. (9650 to 581) *). The decr. is used too, though and I can
understand both.

However, if crescendo is abbreviated cresc. then it is logical to abbreviate
decrescendo decresc. by just adding a de- in the beginning. I don't have any
music notation hand book close by so this point of view is not based on any
hard facts.

-Risto

*)
decrescendo decresc -> 9650
decrescendo decr -> 581
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Wrong-abbreviation---decr.-tf4849531.html#a13892738
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.