Re: spacing, version 2.10 and 2.11

[sdfgsdhdshd]

Neil Puttock wrote:
> 
> Just to let you know, we've just changed the code for rationals so
> they use 64 bits of precision rather than 32.  This should hopefully
> solve the problems you've been having.  The new code will be in the
> next development release, 2.11.59.
> 
> I've attached a re-run of your snippet using the new code; it's much
> improved since it correctly renders the whole system.
> 

Amazing result!

Will this 64 bits stuff work on 32 bits PCs?





-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/spacing%2C-version-2.10-and-2.11-tp18665268p19557365.html
Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.