[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged
From: |
Neil Puttock |
Subject: |
Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:04:46 +0000 |
2009/3/17 Francisco Vila <address@hidden>:
> 2009/3/17 Patrick McCarty <address@hidden>:
>> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Francisco Vila <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> 2009/3/16 David Bobroff <address@hidden>:
>>>> I'm getting this same problem on 2.12.2 with the PDF. I also get:
>>>>
>>>> warning: flag `d7' not found
>>>>
>>>> This is with version 2.12.2
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>
>>> 'u7' is not found, either. Tested on a newly compiled 2.12.3 1967f949e3c.
>>
>> That's strange that you are getting this error when compiling from
>> git. Are you sure you did a `make clean'? This should clear out
>> mf/out/*, and `make all' should rebuild the fonts.
>>
>> Can you test on the latest master? The commit you mention is nearly a
>> month old.
>>
>> As you can see, the new 2.13 doc NEWS page shows the correct example:
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/topdocs/NEWS
>>
>>
>> -Patrick
>
> Now it works. Besides, my last-resort script which I call "makemake"
> fails to build the docs. Any ideas?
Fixed in git - it's a docstring in the wrong place.
As for the font problem, if you have a look at 2.13 on kainhofer.com,
it's still not right, since the \snappizzicato articulation is blank.
Regards,
Neil
- unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Mark Polesky, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, David Bobroff, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Patrick McCarty, 2009/03/16
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Francisco Vila, 2009/03/17
- Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged,
Neil Puttock <=
Re: unbeamed 128th note is also unflagged, Mats Bengtsson, 2009/03/16