[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond-book is not flavor independent

From: Cláudia Soares
Subject: Re: lilypond-book is not flavor independent
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:47:43 +0000

On 2009/03/28, at 13:46, Graham Percival wrote:

Also, convert-ly requires decorator functions (I think that was
the name), which are another 2.4 feature.

decorators are another issue. No back compatibility in python < 2.4.
Sometimes I wonder why are we coding python if it changes so much...

Does Guido expects that we keep rewriting our old work over and over again? Sorry for the rant. Each time I think about such things I love lisp more and more...

I should clarify another point: out of all the main developers, I
know the least about python and cross-platform building.  I'm just
discussing these points with you because I happen to have time at
the moment, and I remember (most) of the answers from when I asked
these questions in the past few years.  :)

Thank you, you've been quite helpful. I hope I can contribute on this. If lilypond-book manages to get well&easily installed in the mac systems maybe the big bunch of musicians and mac users start to switch to lilypond, namely to prepare lesson materials or simple texts with musical ideas. This latex lilypond integration is a very good concept.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]