[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Stem lenghts
From: |
Mark Polesky |
Subject: |
Re: Stem lenghts |
Date: |
Sun, 10 May 2009 23:15:10 -0700 (PDT) |
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
> defects, for example the second and last beam, both presenting those
> small white triangles which should *never* be present in former times
> since they can be flooded with ink as soon as the printing plate gets
> used a bit.
And this is exactly the problem with the default LilyPond
output - small white triangles. See the attachment in my
previous post:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2009-05/pngbNqzog15lv.png
Perhaps we could add a patch to the beam-scoring algorithm
that would penalize configurations that lead to small
white triangles? Or if there's already one, increase the
penalty?
- Mark
- Stem lenghts, Pekka Siponen, 2009/05/10
- Re: Stem lenghts, Pekka Siponen, 2009/05/11
- Re: Stem lenghts, Werner LEMBERG, 2009/05/11
- Re: Stem lenghts, Pekka Siponen, 2009/05/11
- Re: Stem lenghts, Mark Polesky, 2009/05/11
- Re: Stem lenghts, Pekka Siponen, 2009/05/11