Re: automatic accidental style voice: too many written accidentals

[Frédéric Bron]

> Under this premise, I think it makes sense to inherit the key signature.
> Now if we have _within_ a voice << { xxx } \\ { yyy } >>, what does this
> mean?  Since the purpose of "voice" accidental style is to write stuff
> that several different people read, this corresponds to splitting a
> tenor voice (for example).  This means that the split voices should not
> just inherit the key signature, but also already preexisting accidentals
> of the "father voice" since obviously the same persons are singing tenor
> 1 and tenor 2 that have been singing tenor previously.  Also, any
> accidental changes within xxx and yyy need to be consolidated into the
> following rejoined voice: if there are different accidentals in xxx and
> yyy for a note, a recurrence of the note after the split needs a
> cautionary accidental.

Good point.
So this would not be the case for voice style (apart from heriting the
key signature) but for modern-voice it would be OK as the cancellation
is at Staff context.

Frédéric