Re: [Q] Issue 999: Enhancement: Dynamics could switch from one staff to another

[Graham Percival]

On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 01:12:07PM +0000, Neil Puttock wrote:
> On 6 February 2010 09:19, Dmytro O. Redchuk <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > So, "just for tracking": since both issues marked as "Enhancement", i
> > believe it's quite safe to leave 999 unverified until 305 be closed.
> 
> I might be wrong, but I think you're supposed to mark duplicates as
> verified if you agree they're duplicates.

Correct.  And the verified should, if at all possible, but
somebody *other* than the person who marked it "fixed".  In the
case of the build-system stuff, I'll probably have to play both
roles, but that's definitely an exception to the rule.

> Now I've looked at this issue in a bit more detail, I think I was a
> bit hasty in marking it as a duplicate.  I'll change it back and
> explain why on the tracker.
 
Ok, thanks!  Then the system is working exactly as planned.  :)

Cheers,
- Graham