Re: lilypond-book html bug

[Graham Percival]

On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Dmytro O. Redchuk
<address@hidden> wrote:
> У пт, 2010-02-12 у 04:08 +0000, Ruben Zilibowitz пише:
>> <lilypond
>> >
>>
>> as the lilypond tag, even though it is a valid way to write it.
>
> If it is the case (i've not tested so far), it may be considered as a
> bug (since sgml/html accepts any number of any "space symbols" before
> ">", as far as i know).

Yes.  HTML is whitespace-insensitive.

> But is it necessary to recognize such cases, really? If You need it,
> please let me know.

Since lilypond-book is supposed to handle HTML files, and that's part
of HTML, we should handle it.

> Now i would rather consider it as a limitation, and would suggest to
> mention this in the Notation Reference. (Thought it may be not too hard
> to fix?..)

I don't think it should be a @knownissue.  This isn't a deliberate
limitation of lilypond; it's a bug.

Please add it as type-scripts priority-low frog, and add a note that I
estimate that it would take 30 minutes for a frog to fix (assuming the
frog knows python)

see the format for issue 1008 or 1009 or 1010 (I can't remember the
number) if you're uncertain about what I mean by the frog stuff.

Cheers,
- Graham