[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:43:50 +0100 |
Mark Polesky wrote Sunday, September 19, 2010 3:54 PM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
But a quick look through some of my music shows dynamics
are more commonly placed above the staff, so I wonder why
placing them below is the default? But I don't have any
instrumental parts to hand - where are the dynamics in
these usually placed?
Vocal dynamics are usually placed above the staff so they
don't interfere with the lyrics. Otherwise, dynamics are
usually placed below the staff for monophonic staves, and
for polyphonic staves when the dynamics are the same.
OK, and as the dynamics _are_ usually the same, and as
dynamics are usually placed in voice one for polyphonic
music, they should be placed, by default, below the staff
for voice one. And, I would argue, for all voices.
But as
Kurt Stone, Ted Ross, and Gardner Read *all* agree,
polyphonic staves with different simultaneous dynamics
require upstem and downstem dynamics to be placed above
*and* below the staff respectively. Why are we arguing when
the authorities are clear on this?
I'm not arguing with that. I'm arguing that this occurs
rarely and there is a perfectly good command for doing
it when it happens. So the default should not be changed.
Trevor
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, (continued)
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, -Eluze, 2010/09/18
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/18
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, -Eluze, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Trevor Daniels, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, David Kastrup, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, David Kastrup, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Trevor Daniels, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Alexander Kobel, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Mark Polesky, 2010/09/19
- Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff,
Trevor Daniels <=
Re: voiceOne dynamics should go above the staff, Phil Holmes, 2010/09/19