[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11
From: |
Dmytro O. Redchuk |
Subject: |
Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11 |
Date: |
Wed, 6 Oct 2010 09:53:26 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Wed 06 Oct 2010, 08:50 David Kastrup wrote:
> "Dmytro O. Redchuk" <address@hidden> writes:
> >> I think a revert would be more appropriate.
> > Please, why?..
>
> Not a revert of the commit. A \revert to the setting before the cadenza.
Oh, understood.
Sorry for the noise :-) And thank you.
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
Bug Squad
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Keith E OHara, 2010/10/05
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/05
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, David Kastrup, 2010/10/06
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, Dmytro O. Redchuk, 2010/10/06
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11, David Kastrup, 2010/10/06
- Re: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11,
Dmytro O. Redchuk <=
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Carl Sorensen, 2010/10/06
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/07
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/07
- Re: Autobeaming and cadenzas (was: bug-lilypond Digest, Vol 95, Issue 11), Patrick McCarty, 2010/10/07