[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Lilypond crash

From: Arno Waschk
Subject: Re: Lilypond crash
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 14:28:44 +0200
User-agent: Opera Mail/10.62 (Linux)

hi, i used ubuntu, machines with 2 or 4 GB RAM resp.
have to use minimal-breaking would be very disappointing...

actually i just wanted to inform that some things not only happen in extreme artificial test cases... and that this breaking thing seems pretty much suboptimal in both optical result as in resource consumption...

yours, arno

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:59:55 +0200, Valentin Villenave <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Arno Waschk <address@hidden> wrote:
well, i came across this problem while creating a *real-world* score, having
1600+ bars and using GBs of memory. it also showed horrible "compiling"
times before Joe created his patches as well. while experimenting a bit with it, i could not find a significant difference between the real-world score,
and a \repeat unfold 1600+ fake score.

[I take it you forgot to include the list]

Interesting. What operating system were you using? How much RAM?

Also, one thing I probably should have mentioned is that the
ly:minimal-breaking algorithm is often mandatory in such demanding


Erstellt mit Operas revolutionärem E-Mail-Modul: http://www.opera.com/mail/

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]