Re: Issue 1303 in lilypond: Consecutive TrillSpanners may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.

[lilypond]

Updates:
        Status: Invalid

Comment #1 on issue 1303 by percival.music.ca: Consecutive TrillSpanners  
may be chained or stacked, depending on the syntax.
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1303

umm... what?

You're suggesting that we should document that starting a new trill spanner  
without stopping the previous one will produce different output based on  
whether or not the notes have ledger lines?  Why on earth would that be  
a "documentation" thing and not a bug?  I mean, there's no way this is a  
deliberate design decision.