[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.13.40 regtests
From: |
Han-Wen Nienhuys |
Subject: |
Re: 2.13.40 regtests |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Nov 2010 02:15:22 -0500 |
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:45 PM, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
> It wouldn't take me long to write a C# program (less than a day, I'd guess)
> that reproduced quite a lot of the regtest checker functionality and did a
> pixel-by-pixel check for image changes. I've done the latter bit in about
> 20 minutes on the figured bass png that started this discussion. The
It would take me about 10 seconds; imagemagick has this functionality
built in (the same one that is used to generate the current images of
the regtest).
http://www.imagemagick.org/script/compare.php?ImageMagick=cnagfba00ks4srknf1dt82ldo3
The reason I did not do it originally is that it moves the comparison
farther away from lilypond itself and pixel-per-pixel changes are not
calibrated for the size of the symbols: a large symbol moving place
will generate a much higher difference score than a small score. It
might have been a quicker way to get started with running comparison
tests.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - address@hidden - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, (continued)
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/25
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Valentin Villenave, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/27
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/29
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/30
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests,
Han-Wen Nienhuys <=
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Graham Percival, 2010/11/26
- Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2010/11/26
Re: 2.13.40 regtests, Phil Holmes, 2010/11/28