[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidental and clef change issue
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Accidental and clef change issue |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Dec 2010 15:14:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Reinhold Kainhofer <address@hidden> writes:
> Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010, um 14:23:14 schrieb Phil Holmes:
>> "David Kastrup" <address@hidden> wrote in message
>> > I don't think it is correct. If you set the above with \key g\major,
>> > you will notice that the key signature is _not_ repeated with a clef
>> > change. So there is no visual or logical reason to assume "accidentals
>> > are reset". If that was the underlying assumption for a clef change,
>> > the key signature would be repeated.
>>
>> So I'm confused as to what the regtest text cited means. It
>> (accidental-clef-change.ly) says "Accidentals are reset for clef changes."
>
>
> I would be great, though, if anyone can find a published example of such a
> situation (most likely in e.g. cello/bassoon parts/scores, which frequently
> switch between bass and tenor clef).
Edition Peters, piano excerpt by Brissler from Mozart Requiem,
"Confutatis". The g in the corni di bassotto entry is not even in the
same octave, and still gets a natural.
confutatis.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
--
David Kastrup
Re: Accidental and clef change issue, James Bailey, 2010/12/28