[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: x-ref intranslated docs
|
From: |
Graham Percival |
|
Subject: |
Re: x-ref intranslated docs |
|
Date: |
Wed, 5 Jan 2011 02:59:02 +0000 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 10:06:16PM +0100, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote:
> I fully translated running.itely (part of usage), which contains
> unnumbered sectioning.
> I then translated input.itely (part of notation), where there is a link
> to a node which is an unmberedsubsec in running (Invoking lilypond).
Unnumbered sectioning is nothing new; we use it all the time in
Notation.
I believe the problem is an @unnumberedsubsec without having a
@node in front of it; this is forbidden by our doc policy. This
does not appear in the english version of running.itely, but I
*do* see one of these in the french version of running.itely.
Cheers,
- Graham