Unnecessary accidental after tied note at the beginning of a new system

[Zoltan Selyem]

% Hello,
%
% Accidentals on tied notes are printed at the beginning of a new
% system. But I think that in these cases there should be no second
% accidental in that measure.
%
% So I think measure 5, 9, and 13 are wrong in the following example:

\version "2.13.53"
\paper{ ragged-right = ##t }
\relative a' {
  \key f \major
  as2 as~ | as as~ | \break
  as~ as~ | as as~ | \break
  as as | b b~ | \break
  b~ b~ | b b~ | \break
  b b | cis cis~ | \break
  cis~ cis~ | cis cis~ | \break
  cis cis 
}

%
%
% Zoltan

acc-tie.png
Description: PNG image